Skip to Content »

Mine rescue debate a warning for authority

  • November 24th, 2010

I'll wait for the inquiry to decide whether the delay in entering the Pike River Coal Mine is justified. But there is already a significant warning for the Police and the Government in the widespread mistrust of their official statements. Officials are now suspected of institutional cowardice whether or not it is justified.

I felt sorry for the spokesmen I heard on radio yesterday morning. They're infected with the bloated jargon disease (people are' resources', the army robot is "defence assets" etc). After years of daily hosings with pompous head office circumlocution they must lose self awareness of how dopey it sounds and how easy it is to mistrust. Those of us outside the public service who still speak old English run our internal translation programme, but the message is overlaid with the flashing  "bullshit warning, bullshit warning".

My sympathy for the spokesmen got strained when they went into directly defensive self-praise of each others' efforts. O for the New Zealand of my father's generation, where praise of yourself and your efforts was something you left strictly for others, and where stoic understatement was the only code to translate.

 The NZ Herald comments page "Are you happy with the authorities' handling of the Pike Rive blast" (currently 22 pages) seethes with mistrust of Police leadership. It reflects the conversations I'm now hearing.  Whether or not justified in this case, that propensity to mistrust should be of very serious concern to the government.

We'll know whether or not the present caution is justified when the presently unknown is known. But it has seeped into public consciousness that the Police do not value heroism. 

Respect for heroism, an evident willingness to sacrifice oneself for others, even foolishly, may be a pre-requisite for  trust in leadership. Certainly Sir Robert Peel, founder of modern policing thought so.

Time for Police Minister Judith Collins to reinstate respect for heroism into the law governing the Police. This does not mean that they must carelessly risk their lives. But every officer must know that if they volunteer to risk their lives they will be honoured, not described as mugs and disciplined.

The law must also restore the ancient liberty that allows individuals to choose to be noble for others even if it seems foolish. The Police should have no right to prevent any of us from exercising a fully informed choice to risk our own lives for another.

A society that has lost the will to prevent suicide, and allows mountain climbing and motorcycle racing and over-eating and drinking and other risky personal choices should never have given the Police the power or the duty to prohibit self sacrifice for more noble purposes.


  • Kiwiwit
  • November 24th, 2010
  • 8:32 am

Well said. We are not in the shoes of the superintendant and mine director running the rescue effort so it perhaps unfair to comment, but I am sure there are individual police officers and miners who have volunteered to go into the mine to ascertain whether anyone is still alive. In another era I am sure one of these offers would have been taken up.

  • Dex
  • November 24th, 2010
  • 8:49 am

It's just the typical armchair heroes playing the blame game. And the problem with letting someone bravely walk into the mine are numerous, not only would they risk setting off a secondary explosion, thus killing themselves and any potential survivors but also creating another recovery effort in which more rescuers are endangered trying to save the lone hero.


How can the law restore a liberty, ie, "allowing us to be noble and rush in to help others". Surely we can just do it?

  • Cadwallader
  • November 24th, 2010
  • 12:01 pm

The current stance of the police runs counter to the state's past ability to conscript for military purposes.

  • Sam P
  • November 24th, 2010
  • 2:26 pm

Well said Mr Franks.  The hesitancy in this approach appears to be leading us into a moment of national shame.
Sure Dex, the rescue attempt can proceed when risk=zero.  And that will be when?

  • Stephen
  • November 24th, 2010
  • 3:30 pm


Sadly, the Police now have power to stop exactly that. I would have to search to find the provisions again but some time ago to my horror I found that they can stop a person entering their own home to rescue their own family, if they wish.

  • Michael
  • November 24th, 2010
  • 6:08 pm

it seems that after the incident it was handled right though probably not before hand.

  • peterquixote
  • November 24th, 2010
  • 7:14 pm



/* Style Definitions */
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;}

and then of course,, after the weakling official cowardly response,
a timely blast to remove all traces,

  • peter yarrell w
  • November 27th, 2010
  • 10:21 pm

WELL SAID stephen
A sad day for NZ when procedures worked out by sincere people, though sincerely without practical wisdom and passion come to write manuals for rescue that ignores the human heart and the responce of decent people that are prepared to sacrifice their lives in the hope of saving many. If my son had been trapped and I was a miner wild horses wouldnt have kept me out of the mine(with the approriate breathing system) It is easy to be wise after the event but why has freedom of actions by the passionyte been over ridden by Political correctness?

Leave your comments:

* Required fields. Your e-mail address will not be published on this site

You can use the following HTML tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>